I'm very hesitant to support the idea of a single *formal* proofreader on this project. In a sum: Volunteer work means volunteer. Professional pubs pay a guy to do it and he's on the hook for it, we can only ask. So putting a single proofreader in place would be pretty much asking for a point of failure. It will happen, and it will probably happen without warning. Family or medical emergencies tend to take people out without a chance to pass the duty over, and by the time anyone realizes there's a problem it's already too late.
To avoid that point of failure - we would need multiple proofreaders who are following a style guide, negating the usefulness of a single reader. At that point - we might as well put it into the standard editor flow with a coherent style guide and require three editors to agree it's good to go based on the standard.
I expect there to be a lot of talking and collaboration amongst the editorial crew, so we should be good. And if there is an editor who does want to take on the task of giving every submission a cleanup pass - that's actually really good - I'd love to see it. But redundancy is always a key need for volunteer projects.
@Wicke - great art!
Health Resources: Register family with 911 services, so providers will have info prior to emergency/disaster. Also mental health info & hotlines, articles, treatment assistance options, prescription assistance, special needs registries, legal aid, and more!