Aren't simultaneous posts fun?
I guess, sometimes 
ps: PM send.
New Game: Cross Purposes
Sun, 2011-06-26 13:13
#53
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Sun, 2011-06-26 13:13
#54
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
On real world Neanderthals... is there any evidence that Neanderthals and humans created fertile offspring, or that Neanderthal DNA is present in modern human genetics? (I believe a lot of older work claimed that Neanderthals were a truly separate species, with significant biological differences, that went entirely extinct.)
Not rock-solid evidence of interbreeding, but plausible. You wouldn't get looked at funny at an anthropology convention for talking about it. Wikipedia saith:
"In May 2010, the Neanderthal Genome Project presented preliminary genetic evidence that interbreeding did likely take place and that a small but significant portion of Neanderthal admixture is present in modern non-African populations."
Sun, 2011-06-26 13:42
#55
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
So far I have:
Jem - Gnome/tiefer rogue
eldersphinx - Human cleric of Chronepsis
Burning Spear - Neanderthal fighter/paragon/witch?
Veltharis, Tim, still interested?
Incidentally, I'm seeing a heck of a lot of imagination in the character concepts all of you have brought up. I like that. 
Sun, 2011-06-26 13:56
#56
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Here's the character work-up for Nim: http://www.3edb.com/viewCharacter.asp?cid=20880
I'm basing her on the changelings from Eberron, so I hope you don't mind me choosing the changeling-specific feats from Races of Eberron. The Self-Reliant feat I took from the Planescape fan campaign book. Like the description says, all it really does is give me an extra skill point every level.
I also went ahead and made the skill changes that I asked about earlier. If there's a problem with that, I'll go and make adjustments as necessary.
I reserve the right to adjust my spell choices up until the game actually begins.
If anybody else wants to give me some interesting suggestions for how to deal with Nim's unspent money, rather than just lugging around a lump of gold, I'm all ears.
I hope this all works out for you!
Sun, 2011-06-26 14:32
#57
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Wicke: May I suggest some armor? AC 13 is a little low -- of course, we'll be separated from our stuff at start anyway, but hopefully you'll be able to get it back!
If Zim approves of the twilight feature from the Magic Item Compendium, a twilight mithral chain shirt +1 has no spell failure chance. Normal chain shirt has 20%, mithral reduces the chance by 10%, and twilight is an armor feature worth a +1 bonus which reduces spell failure chance by another 10%. The total cost for this item -- which my wizard in another game swears by -- is 5100gp. You could replace the ring of protection and the elixirs of fire breath.
As for the remaining gold, I always like to keep it in a few gems. 50 coins to the pound can get heavy. :^)
Sun, 2011-06-26 14:44
#58
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Wicke:
Most of this is all right, but I really want to turn down the Improved Minor Shapechange feat. Being able to convincingly imitate a human/tiefling/elf/whatever is one thing... but a PC who would be able to fly 120' per round, for example (and be able to do so all day), or burrow/swim at a high rate, creates dilemmas for your DM.
For example, being able to impersonate a specific NPC for purposes of convincing someone to ferry the party across the Styx, that's fine. Being able to fly the party across the River Styx herself, not so much.
With that said, I like this "ultimate infiltrator/imitator" character concept; we just need to work out what the limits are on what unusual physical abilities she's able to imitate.
As a sorceress, if she has a form lying around that's flight-capable, she would be able to simply fly 24 hours a day and rain spells down on her enemies.
As she's a spellcaster, she could just buy the necessary spells, if an ability like flight is something you really want to have. (This also prevents her from using that trick 24 hours a day.)
(Edit: Polymorph is incredibly easy to abuse -- in combat, I mean, not in the "imitate various NPCs" sense. The same is true of alter self, though to a lesser degree - especially if it's an "at will" ability.)
Sun, 2011-06-26 15:33
#59
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I'm definitely still interested. Debating between doing the Athar idea from above as a Fighter (or Ranger, maybe) who began training as a pally in his backstory and just never "graduated," so to speak, (no paladin levels, probably NG, but otherwise much the same) or doing something entirely different altogether. I'll let you know as soon as I decide. And yes, I promise to play a flexible good. May even end up churning out something TN with a good intentions, less-than-good methods feel to it.
Sun, 2011-06-26 16:12
#60
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
And yes, I promise to play a flexible good.
[EvilDM rubs her hands together] Excellent!
A note on Athar: Don't expect a lot of healing/benign spells from clerics of specific deities. (I suppose this goes without saying.) Even in the event the cleric is willing, a cleric in this game is a conduit of divine power, and a cleric's deity might essentially react as follows: "You want Me to heal this godless heathen, why?" Of course, this varies to some extent from one deity to another (though most don't care for Athar), and does not extend to things like potions and scrolls. There are also unusual situations (the Athar in question is considered a possible candidate for conversion, or the Defier is on a quest that the deity would consider important for some reason) where it wouldn't apply.
Of course, in 3e, there are a lot of alternatives for healing that don't require a cleric (potions, scrolls, UMD skill, bards, rangers, psions...). There are also Athar clerics in the multiverse who worship the Great Unknown and don't mind healing other members of their faction.
I also hope that eldersphinx's character and Tim's character will be able to tolerate each other on at least a minimal level (though bickering and disagreement are fine, and may in fact amuse the DM).
Sun, 2011-06-26 16:45
#61
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I figure a Human Cleric of Chronepsis will probably be... less than aggressive? At least that's my guess. And Varish's atheism would be less a matter of trying to convert others and more a matter of personal bitterness.
Actually, will we be spending a reasonable amount of time in the cities of the planes? I'd tempted to say that after his disillusionment, Varish decided to go for a more subtle form of combating evil and trained as an Urban Ranger, maybe with some kind of alternate feature to replace the Animal Companion if I can find one and that's okay by you.
EDIT: Varish, Virash, To-may-to, to-mah-to. I'll pin down a proper name after I've pinned down a character concept.
Sun, 2011-06-26 16:59
#62
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Actually, will we be spending a reasonable amount of time in the cities of the planes?
Yep, though not necessarily to the point of exclusion.
Urban Ranger is OK. I don't have the stats on a trapfinding ranger offhand -- it's a fairly simple variant, isn't it?
I figure a Human Cleric of Chronepsis will probably be... less than aggressive? At least that's my guess.
Seems likely, but I felt I had to provide the obligatory "cleric and Defier in the same party" speech.
Sun, 2011-06-26 17:12
#63
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Tim: since we're rules-light, if Zim approves, perhaps the Pathfinder "allies" version of the bond? Or their spirit ranger variant "spirit bond" ability? These are in the PF SRD at http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/core-classes/ranger , but here's the text for the two possible options:
At 4th level, a ranger forms a bond with his hunting companions. This bond can take one of two forms. Once the form is chosen, it cannot be changed. The first is a bond to his companions. This bond allows him to spend a move action to grant half his favored enemy bonus against a single target of the appropriate type to all allies within 30 feet who can see or hear him. This bonus lasts for a number of rounds equal to the ranger's Wisdom modifier (minimum 1). This bonus does not stack with any favored enemy bonuses possessed by his allies; they use whichever bonus is higher.
(The other option is the animal companion.)
Spirit Bond (Ex): At 4th level, instead of forming a bond with his hunting companions or an animal companion, the spirit Ranger forms a bond with the spirits of nature themselves. Each day, as long as he is within one of his favored terrains, the Ranger can cast augury as a spell-like ability with a caster level equal to his Ranger level. In addition, he can call upon these spirits to cast any one Ranger spell that he is capable of casting, without having to prepare the spell. At 8th level, and every four levels thereafter, he can cast an additional spell in this way. This ability replaces hunter’s bond.
There would normally be an upgrade of this at 12th level, but it replaces the camouflage ability, which the urban ranger doesn't get (assuming you're using the Unearthed Arcana version; the Pathfinder Urban Ranger also replaces camouflage at 12th level, so if you'd probably have to pick which ability to get).
Neither version of the Urban Ranger has a lot of trapfinding ability -- but I'm pouring skill points into that for Devon who has the rogue features, so hopefully we'll be good for that! :^)
Sun, 2011-06-26 18:48
#64
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Wicke: May I suggest some armor? AC 13 is a little low -- of course, we'll be separated from our stuff at start anyway, but hopefully you'll be able to get it back!
If Zim approves of the twilight feature from the Magic Item Compendium, a twilight mithral chain shirt +1 has no spell failure chance. Normal chain shirt has 20%, mithral reduces the chance by 10%, and twilight is an armor feature worth a +1 bonus which reduces spell failure chance by another 10%. The total cost for this item -- which my wizard in another game swears by -- is 5100gp. You could replace the ring of protection and the elixirs of fire breath.
As for the remaining gold, I always like to keep it in a few gems. 50 coins to the pound can get heavy. :^)
I think I forgot to add in the ring to the AC, but yeah, even 14 is pretty low on its own. I figure I'd be casting Mage Armor, then supplementing everything with a Shield spell if things got really dicey. All that together would put me at about AC 22 total: +3 Dex, +1 deflection from ring, +4 armor bonus, +4 shield bonus. She's really not going to be of much use in a fight, outside of hampering the enemies so everybody else can take them down.
Sadly, I don't have ready access to a copy of the Magic Item Compendium, so I'll have to take your word on the armor. It does sound like a better match up than the potion and the ring though.
Most of this is all right, but I really want to turn down the Improved Minor Shapechange feat. Being able to convincingly imitate a human/tiefling/elf/whatever is one thing... but a PC who would be able to fly 120' per round, for example (and be able to do so all day), or burrow/swim at a high rate, creates dilemmas for your DM.
For example, being able to impersonate a specific NPC for purposes of convincing someone to ferry the party across the Styx, that's fine. Being able to fly the party across the River Styx herself, not so much.
With that said, I like this "ultimate infiltrator/imitator" character concept; we just need to work out what the limits are on what unusual physical abilities she's able to imitate.
I understand completely, and that really was about the only part that I was uncertain of. I'm not really envisioning Nim as the sort of mage that'll fly around raining down destruction from on high. The magic is really there to supplement her ability to infiltrate and get back out safe.
Just a few things to keep in mind as far as the ability goes though: 1) I'd only be able to imitate something that has up to 5 HD, which means I wouldn't have access to anything particularly powerful; and 2) I'd really only be able to draw from something with the humanoid-type, and there aren't too many humanoids that have exotic means of movement (certainly none that move at 120').
If your still concerned, you could limit my ability to use exotic movement to my base speed (or less) and/or limit it to a number of rounds per day equal to my Con score or something. Either of those changes would limit how much it could be abused. Worst case, I suppose could have the superficial appearance of wings or burrowing claws or whatever, but none of the functionality.
Hmm...looking at all that now and how the ability works, I'm wondering: Nim's ability to imitate things only extends to humanoid-types. So I'm left wondering if she would be able to imitate things which just looked humanoid, but were, in fact, outsiders of some type? Different celestials or fiends, specifically. I mean, it's not too far of a leap to go from looking like a gnoll to a lupinal or bulezau, but both are outside the HD range and violate the humanoid-type restriction.
Honestly, I'd be willing to give up the ability to adopt the physical abilities of what I was imitating (like flight or burrowing, natural armor or weapons and such) to be able to imitate things which were outside range stipulated by the spell. I'm not really looking for a mechanical advantage in all this, just one that gives me the most flexibility in social situations.
Sun, 2011-06-26 19:03
#65
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I wouldn't expect point of exclusion, of course - just wanted to make sure it was a reasonable choice. Scratch the trapfinding variant, forgot about the rogue.
And yeah, fair enough on the cleric thing. We'll see how it plays out, eh?
Thanks, Jem, but I've always been "meh" on the Hunter's Bond option there. Spirit Bond is nifty but of course 3.5 doesn't have a "favored terrain" (though I guess we could count Urban for this guy... or... something.)
Facing the same issue as Spirit Bond, but again if Zim's okay with allowing "urban" as the terrain, from a 3pp:
Guide’s Bond (Ex): At 4th level, a ranger may choose guide’s bond instead of hunter’s bond. All allies within 30 feet of a ranger gain a bonus to initiative checks and Perception, Stealth, and Survival skill checks equal to half the ranger’s favored terrain bonus (change this to Wis bonus or half Wis bonus, or just use half of what the favored terrain bonus WOULD be?) when he and his allies are in that terrain. The ranger and his allies must be able to see or hear each other for this ability to work.
And if that's an issue, maybe I'll just stick with the animal companion.
Sun, 2011-06-26 19:23
#66
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I would like a Brixashulty as a familiar, its from Races of the Wild, a Medium animal, kinda Goat. seeing as it is a medium animal, to have it as a familiar, I would need to take the Improved Familiar feat?
Sun, 2011-06-26 19:57
#67
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
The only decent piccy I could find in a short search..
Sun, 2011-06-26 19:47
#68
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Honestly, I'd be willing to give up the ability to adopt the physical abilities of what I was imitating (like flight or burrowing, natural armor or weapons and such) to be able to imitate things which were outside range stipulated by the spell. I'm not really looking for a mechanical advantage in all this, just one that gives me the most flexibility in social situations.
DM finds the idea of impersonating exemplars to be hilarious. How about this: Nim is able to assume the appearance of creatures that are basically humanoid in form (not bigger than say 7', basic two arms/two legs/spine/one head design), but does not receive any special abilities (such as flight or extra damage from claws or increased movement rate). So, technically, she could assume the appearance of an erinyes (though she'd be flightless), but not a molydeus (way too big, 2 heads). Also gelatinous cubes are out, due to not being of the basic humanoid size/shape. As far as smaller size goes, a gnome or halfling would be OK but an imp would not be (too tiny).
I noticed that Nim's spell list includes a lot of spells that are opposed by Will saves (though Magic Missile works against a wider variety of things). Just pointing out that things with high Will saves would be more difficult for her.
Re: Guide's Bond: We'd have to fiddle with it a bit for 3.0/3.5, since I think Perception breaks down to something like Listen + Spot and Stealth breaks down to Move Silently + Hide. Is this an always-on thing or something that works for a certain duration per day?
Sun, 2011-06-26 21:30
#69
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Right - sorry, I've been playing PF so much I forgot about the skill break-downs for a second there. I believe it reads as always-on, if you want it to be a certain duration/day that makes sense too, and if I'm asking for too many fiddly bits I'll just play a straight up UA Urban Ranger.
By the way, any Faction-based abilities other than taking Faction feats from the PSCS document? Just wanted to check.
Sun, 2011-06-26 22:10
#70
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
DM finds the idea of impersonating exemplars to be hilarious. How about this: Nim is able to assume the appearance of creatures that are basically humanoid in form (not bigger than say 7', basic two arms/two legs/spine/one head design), but does not receive any special abilities (such as flight or extra damage from claws or increased movement rate). So, technically, she could assume the appearance of an erinyes (though she'd be flightless), but not a molydeus (way too big, 2 heads). Also gelatinous cubes are out, due to not being of the basic humanoid size/shape. As far as smaller size goes, a gnome or halfling would be OK but an imp would not be (too tiny).
I have no problem with those stipulations and it's right in line with what I was thinking. I suspect that Nim has gone wandering around in the Market more than once under the guise of a fiend that was handing out free food, offering life advice to people and generally being pleasant to everybody she came across. It's a game she calls Mr. Demon Has A Good Day. ^_^ Nim has a lot of games like that: the aforementioned A Prime Goes to the Market, but also Pissy Mr. Deva and Ms. Firre Can't Carry A Tune.
I noticed that Nim's spell list includes a lot of spells that are opposed by Will saves (though Magic Missile works against a wider variety of things). Just pointing out that things with high Will saves would be more difficult for her.
Yeah, I was noticing that too after I finished up my spell list, but a number of those are Will negates (harmless) or they're low level and nothing I'd expect to work against bigger foes. I did swap out Hideous Laughter for Resist Energy, and I'm debating on whether to exchange Dispel Magic for Greater Magic Weapon (which could give the melee types temporary access to +2 weaponry). It's a tough call.
Mon, 2011-06-27 23:01
#71
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Updated character sheet: http://www.3edb.com/viewCharacter.asp?cid=20880
Tracked down a copy of both the Magic Item and Spell Compendiums and I adjusted my gear and spell lists respectively. I ended dropping the ring of protection and fire breath potions to buy the twilight armor that Jem suggested. Feel free to look over my revised gear and spell list and let me know if you have any problems with any of the adjustments I made.
Mon, 2011-06-27 23:06
#72
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Double post
Tue, 2011-06-28 01:53
#73
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Room for one more?
I've got an idea for a slightly disillusioned Sodkiller, longing for the good old Mercykiller days, just how long after the Faction War is the game set?
Tue, 2011-06-28 04:03
#74
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Ugh, Sodkillers. Man I dunno if I want to play with someone whose idea of a philosophy is that lots of folks just need killing. Zim mentioned grimdark, but hopefully it won't be too very. Devon is in this for the Big Damn Heroing[tm].
Tue, 2011-06-28 05:24
#75
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
We're not talking hack and slash Sodkiller here, more a veteran Mercykiller who's been around a long time and is starting to think that the Sodkillers are getting out of hand.
So its a "practical philosopher" with limited intellectual scope and a penchant for violence. Sort of a tragic character that got caught up in the faction because of his strong beliefs, but is feeling let down by high ups.
I figure he's very interested in justice, maybe even deeply religious if I can find the proper diety.
But if that sounds too far out, I could make him a hardliner among the Sons of Mercy instead, although that doesnt sound very grimdark.
Tue, 2011-06-28 06:21
#76
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Hardliner Son of Mercy would be considerably more livable, yeah.
Tue, 2011-06-28 06:51
#77
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
A Sodkiller certainly wouldn't have many problems working with evil characters though, so that might be a plus. Not sure how Nim would fare against somebody whose philosophy was centered around upholding the law though. Hehehe...
Tue, 2011-06-28 09:10
#78
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
So, any comments about the 2 variants of Witch?
Fri, 2011-07-08 18:56
#79
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I would like for my Neanderthal to come from Ravenloft actually..
I like the thematics of that setting, and it meshes with the fact that the
Neanderthal doesn't know much of Planescape, but not for being dumb,
but simply because he just crossed the borders of mist and instead of
ending up in the bordering Domain, he ended up near Curst. As a
youngster he was nearly killed, but because of the tenacity of the
race he is, he was able to cling to life and shrug off the near death
experience.
Edit: more on this when I have more Light-bulb times
I rolled:
4D6-lowest resulting in:
18, 15, 15, 14, 13, 12
with racial mods of +2 str, +2 con, -2 int, -2cha it amounts to:
15 Str; 17
14 Dex; 14
13 Con;16 (incl the +1 from 4th lvl)
18 Int; 16
15 Wis; 17 (incl +2 from Human Paragon lvl 3)
12 Cha; 10
Feats:
-Able Learner
-Exotic Weapon prof. Firearms
-Practised Spell-caster
-Close Quarter Fighting
-Dead man Walking
-Back to the Wall
=Possible Familiar, after I gain +7 bab, as I already have 7th caster lvl. (though only 2nd lvl spells really)
Nimrod
Male Neanderthal Paragon3/ Witch2/Fighter2, Level 7, Init +2, HP / , Speed 30
AC 12, Touch 12, Flat-footed 10, Fort +7, Ref +3, Will +9, Base Attack Bonus 5
(+2 Dex)
Abilities Str 17, Dex 14, Con 16, Int 16, Wis 17, Cha 10
Condition None
Tue, 2011-06-28 17:02
#80
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Just for ease of reference:
:
Submitted by ripvanwormer on Wed, 04/19/2006 - 13:53
"We say exactly what we think," Trias announced proudly. Can you say as much? How about 'trapped' - can you say that? Trapped in the cell, trapped in the town, can't go up, can't go down. You see, if you can't demonstrate a clear destination and purpose, the wall watch won't let you out of Curst. Curst won't let you out of Curst. The city sinks its hooks into your head, and you just can't leave."
- Plugin <em></em> Not Found novelization
Curst is the Gate-town in the Outlands built around the portal to Carceri.
Curst is a circular walled city. The portal to Carceri is right in the center of town. The inhabitants of Carceri are all exiles and the descendents of exiles; they put a tremendous effort into locking out the rest of the Multiverse, but really they're only locking themselves in. The lawmen of Curst are brutal and often unfair. They're tools of the local strongman, Tovus Giljaf, in keeping the people of Curst miserable and plotting.
Sources
Planescape Campaign Setting
A Player's Primer to the Outlands
Tue, 2011-06-28 16:55
#81
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Burning, the other stuff about Curst is cool, but could you delete the long entry about Hopeless? I think you added that by mistake.
Information on Curst: /forum/curst-gatetown-caerceri
Tue, 2011-06-28 17:16
#82
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Burning, the other stuff about Curst is cool, but could you delete the long entry about Hopeless? I think you added that by mistake.
Nope, I added it, because I found that info whilst looking for Gatetowns..
but spoiler tag takes it away for those who think it irrelevant.
Tue, 2011-06-28 17:38
#83
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
By the way, any Faction-based abilities other than taking Faction feats from the PSCS document? Just wanted to check.
Given that your guy will be screwed on clerical healing, I think he deserves some kind of bonus as well... How about a +4 on saves against offensive divine magic sent his way? This would only apply to spells where a saving throw is applicable and magic resistance would apply (the inflict group of spells for example). (No +4 to saves vs. the Earthquake spell, for example, though if an Athar is facing someone powerful enough to cast Earthquake, that Defier has bigger problems anyway.) This would apply to casters whose magic comes directly from a deity (clerics, paladins...), but wouldn't apply to magic from an item (scrolls, etc.).
If you wouldn't like that but would instead prefer one of the Athar-specific feats from the PSCS for free, I'll consider it, depending on the feat in question.
Tue, 2011-06-28 17:53
#84
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Guide’s Bond (Ex): At 4th level, a ranger may choose guide’s bond instead of hunter’s bond. All allies within 30 feet of a ranger gain a bonus to initiative checks and Perception, Stealth, and Survival skill checks equal to half the ranger’s favored terrain bonus (change this to Wis bonus or half Wis bonus, or just use half of what the favored terrain bonus WOULD be?) when he and his allies are in that terrain. The ranger and his allies must be able to see or hear each other for this ability to work.
We could try the following:
+2 to Listen/Spot/Hide/Move Silently/Survival for allies within 30 feet, but only while the ranger is within line of sight and realistically able to communicate via hand signals or whatnot (not in a darkness globe, not unconscious, not in another room with the door closed). The idea here is that the ranger is able to help his allies avoid the obvious nightengale flooring, loose cobblestones, and so on. I think I'll rarely use Survival checks in an urban environment anyway ("is that nasty water safe to drink?").
Tue, 2011-06-28 18:15
#85
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Exotic Weapon prof. Firearms
Gun-toting Neanderthal spellcaster from Ravenloft? I'm going to see an epic background for this guy, right?
On the Ravenloft thing... I don't have a single Ravenloft product, other than that awful novel about the elven vampire. As long as it only adds interesting background fluff, I think that'd be ok. If his being from Ravenloft would add special powers of any kind... maybe not.
On the firearms thing... I have to think about it. Ordinarily I'd be highly tempted to say "no," simply because I don't like 'em in a D&D game. Not for game mechanics reasons, but for thematic reasons; to me, firearms are the #1 thing that distinguishes a fantasy game from an RPG in a modern setting.
What type of firearm would you want him to be proficient in?
Tue, 2011-06-28 18:17
#86
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Exotic Weapon prof. Firearms
Gun-toting Neanderthal spellcaster from Ravenloft? I'm going to see an epic background for this guy, right?
On the Ravenloft thing... I don't have a single Ravenloft product, other than that awful novel about the elven vampire. As long as it only adds interesting background fluff, I think that'd be ok. If his being from Ravenloft would add special powers of any kind... maybe not.
Well, he is bright, has a high intelligence but isn't superman
There are some feats in the source book, which seem fitting for a Diehard race, so I added those to him. will pm some details.
Tue, 2011-06-28 18:28
#87
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Your version of Guide's Bond sounds EXACTLY like what I want for my character. Thank you!
As for the Sodkiller, I dunno Zim's opinion yet, but I actually like the more fleshed-out version you gave us. Then again, maybe my boy just wants another well-intentioned cynic in the party.
Background things are starting to come together... I'll just wait until I've got a long one and then post that. It should be soon, though. The +4 vs. offensive divine spells sounds loverly, thank you, I'll let you know for sure that or an Athar feat after I comb the PSCS document some more.
Tue, 2011-06-28 18:41
#88
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
The +4 vs. offensive divine spells sounds loverly, thank you, I'll let you know for sure that or an Athar feat after I comb the PSCS document some more.
To clarify, this only applies when one or more specific deities are involved in some sense. Yeah, it'll work fine against most clerics (paladins, etc...), but there are rare cases such as "cleric of a principle or a force" or "cleric of the Great Unknown" where a "divine magic spell" in game terms is not a divine spell in the sense that I mean. Still, it'll work fine most of the time.
Tue, 2011-06-28 19:20
#89
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I was wondering why it seemed like Faithless Blessing-but-better - that makes sense, the flavor works, and yeah. None of the Athar-specific feats grabbed me so that sounds perfect, thanks.
Tue, 2011-06-28 19:35
#90
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I've got an idea for a slightly disillusioned Sodkiller, longing for the good old Mercykiller days, just how long after the Faction War is the game set?
Possible, but remember, all the PCs are starting on the INSIDE of a dungeon. Without wanting to spoil the plotline, he/she should want to get out of said dungeon; a pure 100% Second Edition Mercykiller might not want to! Both Sodkillers and Sons of Mercy can be more flexible in such a situation, though (Sodkillers being more pragmatic, and Sons of Mercy being more interested in abstract justice, I believe).
Tue, 2011-06-28 22:51
#91
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Virash Chaudri
More details on enemies and allies, as well as his relationship with Sevissi, to come. I hope that's long enough? Anything else in particular you'd like to see, or any changes I need to make?
EDIT: And of course his reason for being in Curst is coming, still working on it. Rolled 4d6 drop lowest and got:
16 16 14 14 12 12
So mechanical work should start soon. Having trouble picking a combat style, may end up looking at 3pp a bit more if the GM doesn't mind (not assuming anything is in for sure without her approval, of course).
Wed, 2011-06-29 01:19
#92
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Possible, but remember, all the PCs are starting on the INSIDE of a dungeon. Without wanting to spoil the plotline, he/she should want to get out of said dungeon; a pure 100% Second Edition Mercykiller might not want to! Both Sodkillers and Sons of Mercy can be more flexible in such a situation, though (Sodkillers being more pragmatic, and Sons of Mercy being more interested in abstract justice, I believe).
If he was placed in the dungeon while pursuing a criminal, it wouldnt be a problem, but the old Mercykiller code isnt essential to the concept, its more about the nature of Law, how you interpret it on a daily basis and how absolute it is.
I'll see if I can write some background later today, for race I was thinking either a Spiker from Planar handbook or a Bladeling (I'd prefer Spiker, as there are fewer special rules) and while fighter seems obvious, he could be a ranger.
A Spiker/Bladeling struggling with the inner darkness vs the Sons of Mercy "spark of good in everyone" idea.
Wed, 2011-06-29 05:11
#93
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Just popping in to say I like Virash. :^)
Wed, 2011-06-29 14:16
#94
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Just let you all know, I am moving from one flat, this friday, to my new one, but the provider can only do a connection on the next friday, so I will be on and off for about a week, just so you all know I am not gone, just delayed by RL.
Thu, 2011-06-30 21:26
#95
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Just popping in to say I like Virash. :^)
I like Virash, too.
Maybe a little more detail on his enemies/allies, but this works.
Thu, 2011-06-30 21:47
#96
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Munin: Wouldn't mind reading more.
Spiker seems ok. What class/classes do you have in mind?
Eldersphinx: Would like to see background/charsheet information for your cleric when you have the time.
Thu, 2011-06-30 22:46
#97
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Oh, more detail is definitely coming, on enemies, allies, and at least one in-between, as well as why he's in Curst. Some rough ideas are floating around, I was just holding off on putting any more time into it until I got the OK on that initial bit. Need to read some papers before tomorrow, though, so tonight if I'm SUPER PRODUCTIVE (unlikely) or, more likely, this weekend.
Thu, 2011-06-30 22:53
#98
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
No rush.
Fri, 2011-07-01 01:12
#99
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
Percy was a Mercykiller, good at it too. He believed in the law, that there was a proper punishment for every crime. He devoted his life to punishing the guilty.
But Percy also had a temper and once in a while a prisoner got beaten up or worse… but when he confessed to the Factotums, they simply said “they’re criminals, let’s call it resisting arrest”. He always tried to do the right thing, the legal thing, but every so often a voice deep inside of him whispered an easier solution, sometimes it just felt more just to kill the criminals instead of imprisoning them.
Percy struggled with this for many years, but then the faction war happened and Percys world was turned upside down, the law and order he’d worked so hard to enforce crumbled around him. In the chaos and confusion most of his friends were quick to join the Sodkillers, seeing an opportunity to have things their own way, to dispense justice as they saw fit.
It would have been all too easy for Percy to go with his friends, to let the inner beast take control and do what felt right instead of what was just. But in the Sons of Mercy he saw a chance to redeem himself, to become a better man.
It wasn’t easy, not everyone in his new faction welcomed him with open arms, Percy had a bit of a reputation and joining a new faction doesn’t wash away the past.
Finding the spark of good in everyone was and still is hard, especially when he isn't certain that there'se a spark within himself.
As for enemies there's obviously a lot, people he put away, relatives of those who "resisted arrest" and so on, not to mention his former Mercykiller friends who joined the Sodkillers. The list of allies is a lot shorter, maybe one old friend in the Sodkillers and a couple of Sons of Mercy allies. I'll post something more concrete soon.
I need to work a bit on a physical description "short and spiky" doesnt seem to be enough 
And there's a story behind the name Percy, which isn't exactly a common Spiker name.
I think he's just a fighter, probably with the Track feat, so he can be a bit of a bountyhunter type. I might look at the dualist prestige class in the DMG, but I'm generally not too keen on a lot of special rules.
Fri, 2011-07-01 01:58
#100
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
There's a bunch of good bounty hunter PrCs, Bloodhound from Complete Adventurer comes to mind, Crimson Scourge from Cityscape fits his personality well, but if you want to play some more straightforward rules that's cool too.
Fri, 2011-07-01 03:08
#101
Re: New Game: Cross Purposes
I do vaguely recall that there was a bounty hunter prestige class in Complete adventurer, but I couldn't remember the name, thanks
I'll look them up and see if they fit
basic answer to your previous post is: no they aren't, not even in the remotest sense.