4th ed excerpt: Angels

37 posts / 0 new
Last post
Darkness_Elemental's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2006-01-13
4th ed excerpt: Angels

here

They conveniently forgot that angels saw use as summoned allies and opponents for evil parties, but I think they're right about evil gods not having any servants to speak of in 3.x. The offhanded bashing of the Great Wheel also bugs me, but you can't deign that people do the same thing to their cosmology.

The article also states that more powerful members of the Eladrin race rule parts of the Feywild (these would be the Firres etc. We already knew that they had been kept on as noble classes, but I believe this is the first official info on what they're nobles of).

Spiteful Crow's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2007-10-10
4th ed excerpt: Angels

Once again, they're throwing out the assumption that people ONLY play good characters. Are they trying to dictate how people run their games?

Not too surprised with the great wheel bashing. They've been doing that since Worlds & Monsters. ¬_¬

ripvanwormer's picture
Offline
Factol
Joined: 2004-10-05
4th ed excerpt: Angels

I don't mind the idea of giving aasimon/angels to evil deities as well. The whole idea that aasimon are a different kind of being who serve the deities directly while archons, guardinals, and eladrins are incarnations of the various alignments, parallel to baatezu, yugoloths, and tanar'ri nearly always creates the reaction, "So who serves the evil gods?" and it's about time that someone answered that.

Of course, as always, the author of this particular piece doesn't seem to really know very much about the topic she's writing about. Excusable, I guess, since there's so very much to know about D&D planar stuff, but one of the most jarring comments was when she claimed that no lower planar beings had anything to do with Erythnul, apparently unaware of the windblades from the Monster Manual IV, an entire race created by Erythnul, and a fine example of evil deities having minions.

Still, the main thrust of the argument is, why do good deities have a set of generic minions while the evil deities have scattered and usually less-powerful examples like windblades, Minions of Set, and linqua? And it's a good one. The real answer is that originally aasimon were the only antitheses the fiendish races had, with archons and later the eladrins and guardinals being created afterwards and causing the aasimon to stick out like a sore thumb. And I don't mind this solution at all.

And those illustrations are very cool-looking.

420
420's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2006-06-27
4th ed excerpt: Angels

Quote:
Meanwhile, evil gods were served by . . . nobody. Sure, there were demons and devils, but they had their own agendas and paid little attention to what the gods were up to—whether good or evil. This left the evil gods with assorted minions and cultists, unless they made alliances with fiends.
This is complete crap.

Yes, evil gods are "served" by evil minions (including demons and devils) with their own agenda. They adhere to the beliefs of those alignments/deities, those beliefs are based on selfishness, power mongering and deceit.

On the other hand, good gods are served by loyal minions who adhere to a set of beliefs that honor loyalty, helpfulness and honesty.

I don't know what the hell the folks at WotC are up to but 420 no like.

-420

Kobold Avenger's picture
Offline
factotums
Joined: 2005-11-18
4th ed excerpt: Angels

I don't mind if Evil (or Lawful or Chaotic) Powers have Devas, Solars and Planetars serving them. It does make for some interesting situations.

Though I can't say I'm too big on these "Angels of Valor" and "Angels of Vengeance". I'd rather them bring back the Aasimon as any alignment beings, the Solar could easily be a 27th+ level solo monster with a dumbed-down statblock, and it would still be more interesting in every way than an Angel of Vengeance which doesn't really inspire much right now.

As for Eladrin, there's 4e stats of the Bralani on one of the simplified statblocks from a DDM card. It's in http://www.wizards.com/dnd/files/DDM_15Dun_RPG.zip and they're near the end of the list.

Dire Lemon's picture
Offline
factotums
Joined: 2007-11-06
4th ed excerpt: Angels

So um... Whatever happened to no more symmetry for it's own sake?

Calmar's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2006-06-07
4th ed excerpt: Angels

So first they turn our beloved devils into fallen angels and now they give them divine neverdowells their own evil angelic servants? Puzzled
In the end 'fallen' mayhap turns out to mean 'resigned'...

__________________

"La la la, I'm a girl, I'm a pretty little girl!"

--Bel the Pit Fiend, Lord of the First (in a quiet hour of privacy)

Squaff's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2007-03-03
4th ed excerpt: Angels

It is funny that "omnipotent" beings like gods "hire" (I lack better term) their servants from outside.

I mean if you are that powerfull you should be able to create your own fanaticaly loyal servants.

Best examples are: Primus-his servants are Modrons, Set has his "Folovers", Rudra's original servants were Maruts. Tiamat has Abishai according to new sources etc...

My point is that word "Angel" comes from greak word that means "messanger", in this case the bringer of god will and way, but in no way such creatures would be nercialy good just becaouse we asociate word Angel with good.

So in some way Modrons are "angels" of Primus.

I think that each god (good or evil) should have its own uniqe servitors, but I guess that gods are not that creative and creation of such servants is taxing buisness, so hiring help from outside is probably esier for everyone. (that would explain why are Asimon so popular).

__________________

One-eyed, one-horned, flying, purple people eater says: "Monsters are nature's way for keeping XPs fresh."

Calmar's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2006-06-07
4th ed excerpt: Angels

Modrons are similar to tanar'ri and baatezu as they represent their plane's alignment. I think that Primus is not a god, just as the demon princes and the infernal rulers are no deities (at least in the traditional sense of pre-4th editions) and the modron hierarchy relates to Primus the same way the various arachnid demons relate to Lolth.

__________________

"La la la, I'm a girl, I'm a pretty little girl!"

--Bel the Pit Fiend, Lord of the First (in a quiet hour of privacy)

Kobold Avenger's picture
Offline
factotums
Joined: 2005-11-18
4th ed excerpt: Angels

It's been said a few times that Asmodeus is a God now in 4e. So technically that would make the Baatezu the Angels of Asmodeus.

Semioughticon's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2008-04-27
4th ed excerpt: Angels

New Blood here, would like to know what version most bashers prefer?

Mechalich's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2004-05-16
4th ed excerpt: Angels

I posted on this subject over on RoE, but I'll post my thoughts again here:

I find it a matter of rather depressing hilarity that the except says: 'meaingwhile the evil gods were serverd by...nobody.'

Are they kidding? I mean seriously? Yes demons and devils were nominally part of their own heirarchy but it had always been that certain components of their factions served gods of evil on a regular and more or less continual basis (and was explicitly stated as such in many places as far back as 2e). Then there were all the specialized servants of the most popular evil gods: Blood Golems of Hextor, Lloth-touched creatures and a slew of other spidery nasties, sons of Kyuss, dragonspawn of Tiamat, several dozen types of undead, minions of set, the list goes on. Evil gods had all the cool servants, the use of Aasimon or Angels for the good deities as generic servants was probably more limiting than what was presented for evil deities who usually had their own unique creatures. WotC has got it backwards here.

Moreover, the focus on the 'exemplar' races of planar denizens not directly affiliated with gods was a strength, not a weakness of D&D. Many DMs create their own homebrew settings or modify existing ones and pretty much the first thing they change are the gods. Focusing on godless demons and devils that were simply representatives of their alignments provided greater continuity across the D&D metaverse. Even when gods were not held in common iconic monsters could be.

Also, creating 'angels' that are evil, or even neutral, messes with some pretty darn highly ingrained human imagery. Most of us, at least in western culture, and to some extent beyond that, associate white-winged, glossy pearl-skinned things with 'good' and nasty bat-winged burning-eyed creatures with 'evil.' It's just part of the human worldview. When the game runs counter to that it loses power. So, while I happen to think the new angels look pretty cool, their art screams to me: badass elemental being, not 'divine bringer of glory.'

Affro's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2007-08-07
4th ed excerpt: Angels

(Note: Long Time Lurker posting for the first time: Hello Everyone!)

Perhaps I should post this in the eponymous thread, but if someone asked me "What do you like about the 4th Edition?" I'd answer "Each and every creative way to reconnect it with Planescape guys like Rip Van Wormer or Mechalich will come up with."

Really, I still cannot stand the flamboyant way and style of explaining the working of new things assumed by WOTC Staff; I still consider preposterous treating what has always been more a "Tinkerer Box With Many Worlds Attached" like DnD an "Oliated System With His Propietary Setting" like, let's say, a World of Darkness Game, or Deadlands, or Seventh Sea...; and all the same, if not suicidical, a clumsy marketing move to fake the non-existence of older player, ignoring a consolidated tradition in the world of fluff (especially when "older player" mean three or four years older: and how many RPG player begin their journey into darkness guided by their slightly older DM?)...

BUT as Rip said, perhaps the suggestion of diversely aligned Angels isn't a bad one.

Instead of speaking about "bad angels to throw against good party" the matter seems to me about the lacking of information about heavenly things (even in Planescape, compared to their Lower Planar counterparts). Both in the PS (true) version and in the 4th edition (false and miscreant) one Aasimon appear to be of mysterious origins, and their attempt to produce a servitor race was somewhat condemnded with the Quesar brilliant failing. Could be interesting if they became truly alien beings: perhaps the Powers tapped in energies unfathomables even to them, or Angels are a Supreme Race of beings bunded by servitude not by force, but by an absolutely unknowable nature; perhaps agents of the Balance in a totally different way than Rilmani; messengers of what lies beyond the Seventh Heaven of Mount Celestia, or, for the truly disturbed amongst us, the Far Realm.

What I hope is to see some new "Monster Angels" that could be refitted in the existing hyerarchies: perhaps, if the traditional Asimoon take their names from the Higher Spheres, new ones could became "Cthonetar, Nuclear, Telluar", Angels of the deep darkness, of the fiery planet hearts, of the tremors (I give them bad names, but that's all can I come up with, silly me!)... And I tremble thinking, if the Deva is something like a Lower planar crusader, what could be his evil counterpart... perhaps a politician, the subtle but evil ambassador of the celestial planes (Yugoloth would love him).

But at the same time, I doubt I'll see the writers at Wizards moving in this direction... I'd like more seeing a writeup by Rip, or Shemeska, or Mechalich (i'm still a big fan of yours superb tome about the Inevitables, you know?) ^_^ ...

Goodbye everyone!

BlackDaggr's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2007-11-15
Back-converting to 3E

After looking over the Angels and Devils excerpts, I think it would be fairly simple to translate new 4E monsters back to 3E with some work. This might be something for Planewalker to encourage, particularly for the new angels. Obviously, we already have succubi and malebranche. Perhaps I will take a crack at it in the next few weeks.

Also after looking over the MM entry, its very apparent to me that the stat block is encouraging an online-like encounter experience. Sigh...

ripvanwormer's picture
Offline
Factol
Joined: 2004-10-05
4th ed excerpt: Angels

It would indeed be a shame if creatures like Minions of Set or the linquas of Sung Chiang could no longer exist because Set and Sung Chiang have "angels" available to them, but I don't see why that should be.

Kobold Avenger's picture
Offline
factotums
Joined: 2005-11-18
4th ed excerpt: Angels

It's best for Evil Gods to have a variety of minions. I can't see why Set wouldn't have Minions of Set if he had angels.

Certainly in Sung Chiang's case Linquas can do many things that angels can't, for one thing they're a lot sneakier, but sometimes he might want to use an "Angel of Vengeance" or an Astral Deva for something.

Affro's picture
Offline
Namer
Joined: 2007-08-07
4th ed excerpt: Angels

Perhaps it should be all about the desire of Angels to fight for a deity.
They remain rare creatures with free will; they choose who they pledge to, but once they decide this, they trascend frantically, communing with the nature of the Power and His Alignement.

Not so much "a mercenary", as they put it in the 4ed excerpt (not something that struck me as particulary plausible, as a matter of ideals and, well, beliefs), but a mysterious form of free will, neither akin to the in-born qualities of Exemplars and the (more or less) boundless life of more mundane creatures we see once and then frolicking in the Prime...

Every Power could (and should) have his custom minion (even the good ones, why not?), the Angel becoming something whose service is desired, rarely lost once gained, but somewhat in need of being "conquered" by a worth deity; if Belief is the primary source of a Power's existence and the faith of followers the measure of his success, how significant may be the loyalty of a a creature with a superior grade of perfection (whatever this may mean in PS?)? And what happens when Angel born?

Just my two cents and some meditations about the idea of a "melting" of old and new...

sciborg2's picture
Online
Factol
Joined: 2005-07-26
4th ed excerpt: Angels

if i use them i'll call them astral harbingers or something and let angel refer to celestials.

__________________

Health Resources: Register family with 911 services, so providers will have info prior to emergency/disaster. Also mental health info & hotlines, articles, treatment assistance options, prescription assistance, special needs registries, legal aid, and more!

ripvanwormer's picture
Offline
Factol
Joined: 2004-10-05
4th ed excerpt: Angels

'sciborg2' wrote:
if i use them i'll call them astral harbingers or something

That's a pretty good name.

Planescape, Dungeons & Dragons, their logos, Wizards of the Coast, and the Wizards of the Coast logo are ©2008, Wizards of the Coast, a subsidiary of Hasbro Inc. and used with permission.